If Democrats achieve that threshold, they would be able to approve tax increases without Republican support in one house of the Legislature. The independently drawn legislative districts and a new primary system were designed to vor more moderate candidates, theoretically leading to more bipartisanship in both houses of the Legislature.
Yes, the new lines give the Democrats a good opportunity to get a supermajority, but they have to win first, Hoffenblum said.
The maps have put several GOP lawmakers on defense. State Sen. Sam Blakeslee, a Republican from San Luis Obispo, has indicated he is unlikely to run again because his Central Coast district now leans Democratic. Modesto Republican Sen. Tom Berryhill is an incumbent whose seat looks difficult to win. And Assemblyman Jeff Miller, R-Corona, appears to have a difficult fight after he announced he would seek a Senate seat.
Republicans, who challenged the map in a fight to maintain their influence in the Legislature, were dealt a major blow: No party has controlled two-thirds of either the Senate or Assembly since voters passed Proposition 13 in 1978 to raise the threshold for tax increases.
It is regrettable that these challenges, based on partisan self-interest, have cost precious taxpayer dollars to defend the work of the peoples commission, said Yao, a Republican from Claremont.
Democratic political strategists cheered the Supreme Courts decision, but Senate President Pro Tem Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, was restrained in his response. He said lawmakers have a lot of work ahead of them this year and that voters will be looking for results.
While Democrats appear to have an advantage on , they still need to put up strong candidates in close districts, he said. In the last election cycle, moderate Republicans were able to win some seats that had been trending Democratic.
Click here for advertising information.
© 2012,Hearst Stations Inc. on behalf of KSBW-TV.
While Republicans are challenging the congressional district lines in federal court, the GOP did not challenge the new Assembly maps because Democrats are less likely to gain two thirds of the 80 seats in that house.
Orange County Republican activist Julie Vandermost filed the lawsuit against the state Senate maps in October. She and GOP interests contend the commission did not meet the constitutional criteria for drawing the maps in a transparent way and in trying to keep communities together, violating the federal Voting Rights Act.
Click here for the privacy policy,terms of use.
Microsoft MapPoint Terms of Use
Republicans stand to lose critical seats to Democrats under the Senate maps because of the states shifting demographics, giving Democrats a better chance of reaching the critical two-thirds majority in the Senate. Democrats currently hold 25 of the 40 seats in the upper chamber and need just two more to hit the tax vote threshold.
The Supreme Court first had to find whether it even had the authority to act because the GOP referendum has yet to qualify. The justices concluded that they did have jurisdiction and then upheld the maps drawn by the citizens commission. It found they were clearly the most appropriate map to be used in the 2012 state Senate elections even if the proposed referendum qualifies for the ballot.
SACRAMENTO, Calif. --The California Supreme Court on Friday upheld a new political map drawn by the states independent redistricting commission in a ruling that gives Democrats their long-awaited opportunity to control two-thirds of a legislative chamber, the threshold needed to pass tax increases.
Supporters of the Republican referendum attempt have turned in petitions with 711, [barber school] Classic Hairdressing hairdressinglondon courses (0) 2011-12-26 9:16:34 000 voter signatures. The secretary of states office said it will determine by Feb. 24 whether the petitions have the roughly 505,000 valid signatures needed to qualify for the November ballot.
All justices agreed the independent commissions maps should be used, rejecting the Republicans contention that they should not be in use while they were being challenged. The court said it considered all possible maps to decide which one best complied with the law.
Microsoft Privacy Statement
The last time one party held a two-thirds majority in one house of the Legislature was after the 1976 election, when Democrats controlled the Assembly. In the Senate, it was 1965, when Democrats had a 27-13 majority, according to E. Dotson Wilson, the chief clerk in the Assembly.
california coastline map Calif. Supreme Court Upholds State Senate Maps,The high court announced its unanimous decision that the Senate map drawn last year by the California Citizens Redistricting Commission should be used in the June primary and November general election, even though a Republican-backed referendum challenging the map is expected to qualify for the ballot.
Six of the seven Supreme Court justices were appointed by Republican governors. The exception is Justice Goodwin Liu, who was appointed last year by Gov. Jerry Brown.
The 14-member citizens redistricting commission was created by voters in 2008 to take the authority for drawing legislative and state Board of Equalization districts away from the Legislature. In 2010, voters expanded the commissions authority to congressional districts.
The Supreme Court justices had several options in considering the case: They could allow the use of the redistricting commissions maps, as they did; used the state Senate districts that have been in place since 2001; devised an alternate plan; or created temporary Senate districts out of pairs of Assembly districts drawn by the commission.
That caution is warranted, said Allan Hoffenblum, co-editor of the nonpartisan California Target Book, which studies legislative and congressional races.
Senate Democrats are pleased but arent surprised that the Supreme Court wisely decided to uphold california coastline map Calif. Supreme Court Upholds State Senate Mapsthe clear will of California voters, he said in a statement. Our focus has been and will continue to be on communicating directly to our constituents about what we are doing to strengthen the economy and our schools.
The court pointed out that unlike any of the other proposed maps, the commissions Senate map already has survived one legal challenge. In October, the state Supreme Court determined that a GOP petition seeking to throw out the commissions maps lacked merit.
Republicans had asked the court to step in because their referendum was likely to qualify.
The views expressed are not those of KSBW.com, KSBW or its affiliated companies. By posting your comments you agree to accept ourTerms of Use.
Im not sure I could be more concerned, which is why I made the decision, over the objection of some people in this town, to pursue the referendum when it came to the Senate, California Republican Party Chairman Tom Del Beccaro said earlier this week.
We are aware of no basis upon which to reasonably question the legality of the commissions certified state Senate map, the court wrote in Fridays opinion. This clearly distinguishes the commission-certified map from each of the alternatives proposed by petitioner.
Del Beccaro said the court ignored the text of the original ballot measure passed by voters, which said the Supreme Court should holcalifornia coastline mapd off on using the commissions boundaries if a referendum is likely to qualify.
This is incredible, what they did, Del Beccaro said. The Supreme Court agreed with us on the merits and then chose to ignore the constitution. They severely undermined the rule of law today.
Peter Yao, the acting chairman of the citizens commission, called Fridays decision a great victory for the people of California and said it was important for the stability of the electoral process in the state.
